A federal judge long removed from her role due to questions surrounding her competence is now appealing to the Supreme Court for reinstatement. Judge Pauline Newman, at 98 years of age, is seeking the opportunity to serve on the bench again.
Her situation highlights broader concerns regarding the aging judiciary, particularly as the average age of federal judges is noted to be 69. The implications of lifetime tenure are coming into focus, raising complex questions about retirement and fitness for duty in the judiciary.
Appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1984 during the Reagan administration, Newman quickly established herself as a notable figure in the specialized field of patent law.
Former colleague Paul Michel commented on Newman, stating that while she remains intellectually sharp and diligent, the dynamics of the court have shifted toward a more critical view of patent issues.
"She's extremely bright, very hardworking, quite independent," said Michel, who shared a professional tenure with Newman for 22 years. He noted her slower pace in drafting opinions and acknowledged that her tendency to dissent has sometimes been met with resistance from her peers.
Disputes regarding her competence escalated in March 2023 when the chief judge of her court initiated an investigation. At the time, Newman was 95 years old.
The appellate court aimed to ascertain her ability to serve, but Judge Newman opted not to participate in an assessment conducted by court-appointed experts. Her legal counsel cited her preference to select her own medical evaluators, who subsequently confirmed her fitness to resume her judicial responsibilities.
"The notion that she is incapable of fulfilling her duties is absurd," asserted her attorney, John Vecchione, senior litigation counsel at the New Civil Liberties Alliance.
To date, there has been no formal ruling declaring Newman incompetent. The legal discourse surrounding her case has revolved around whether she has received fair process in the proceedings meant to assess her capabilities. Vecchione emphasized the unfair nature of her lengthy absence from the bench.
"I mean there have been sexual harassers, there have been people who fudged their ... expenses," he remarked, pointing out that individuals involved in various forms of misconduct have not faced similar exclusion from judicial responsibilities as Newman has, who he contends has committed no infractions.
Throughout her suspension, Newman has remained active in her field by attending legal conferences, participating in events, and continuing to write, according to accounts from former colleagues.
In a recent video produced by her legal team, Newman articulated her commitment to challenging what she perceives as undue pressure.
"I thought that it was ridiculous and I should not succumb or set a pattern of judicial colleagues being able to bully and intimidate and force out a colleague they don't like who writes dissents," Newman remarked.
Earlier this month, she petitioned the Supreme Court to examine her claims of denied due process. While her request faces significant odds, as the high court only hears a small fraction of petitions each term, it nonetheless underscores her pursuit of justice.
The Federal Circuit, where Newman previously served, declined to comment on the matter. The Justice Department, which is representing the court in this contentious issue, also refrained from providing a statement.
An internal committee responsible for addressing allegations of judicial conduct and disability dismissed Newman’s claims regarding due process in a decision issued on March 24. This committee, composed of some of the most esteemed judges in the federal judiciary, determined that Newman retains her office within the courthouse, employs a law clerk, and continues to receive her salary and benefits.
"Judge Newman cannot have been deprived of a property interest in an office she still holds," the committee concluded. Their findings also indicated an expectation for Newman to undergo further medical evaluation.
Share this story