During a congressional hearing on Wednesday, Senate Democrats criticized the Trump administration for what they perceive as a betrayal of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) fundamental mission to safeguard public health and the environment. The criticism was directed at the agency's leadership over a proposal to significantly reduce its budget.
Lee Zeldin, the EPA administrator, attended this Senate environment committee hearing as part of his third budget hearing of the week, advocating for a substantial cut to the agency's funding. This proposal comes at a time when the EPA's staffing has already reached its lowest level in decades under his guidance. Throughout the week, Zeldin, a former Republican congressman from New York, adopted a confrontational stance, frequently countering questions from Democratic senators and members of the House by accusing them of unpreparedness or a lack of concern for the agency's historical impact.
Under Zeldin's direction, the EPA has abolished significant climate change initiatives, championed what he describes as the most extensive deregulation efforts in U.S. history, and terminated billions in Biden-era environmental justice funding, citing a desire to halt "EPA's radical diversity, equity, and inclusion programs."
"This budget proposal embodies various efficiencies and a renewed focus on fulfilling Congress's directives, underscoring our commitment to a more streamlined, efficient, and accountable EPA that serves the American people," Zeldin stated in his remarks to senators on Wednesday.
The Trump administration's proposed budget for the EPA, at $4.2 billion, would drastically reduce funding for state environmental programs and loans for state-managed water projects. Additionally, it would terminate what it labels "radical climate research" and diminishes resources for enforcement and compliance. The budget does, however, request increased funding to expedite project permitting and tackle drinking water crises.
"Zeldin has carried out the fossil fuel industry's agenda. A substantial reckoning is on the horizon," remarked Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democratic senator from Rhode Island.
Responses to Democratic Inquiries
In budgetary matters, Congress holds the final authority, and historically, lawmakers often diverge from the budget requests made by the White House.
Last year, Congress rejected a significant portion of Donald Trump's proposed cuts, opting to decrease agency funding by merely 3.5%, despite the administration's request for a more than 50% reduction. Democrats asserted that the current budget plan indicates Zeldin's alignment with industry interests while disregarding the detrimental health impacts associated with pollution, such as cancer and asthma.
"The budget proposal resembles a manifesto of climate change denial," stated Rosa DeLauro, a Democratic representative from Connecticut and the ranking member on the House appropriations committee. During a Monday hearing, she inquired how the EPA could justify neglecting its responsibility to protect the American populace "under the pretext of economic growth."
The EPA's actions now include withdrawing a pivotal finding that underscores the dangers posed by the climate crisis, loosening regulations implemented during the Biden administration aimed at reducing pollution from coal plants, and proposing the elimination of greenhouse gas emission standards for certain vehicles.
In her response, DeLauro posed a question regarding where the Clean Air Act addresses climate change and referenced a recent Supreme Court ruling that has limited the EPA's jurisdiction to enforce robust regulations.
"You do not possess the authority to deny the existence of climate change or label it as a hoax," DeLauro asserted.
Zeldin countered by suggesting that she should be well-versed in the recent Supreme Court decisions, stating, "You're simply someone who enjoys having the microphone."
DeLauro labeled the administration's conduct as "arrogant," claiming it belittles the purpose of the federal agencies.
Zeldin challenged Josh Harder, a Democratic representative from California, by dismissing data he referenced regarding the agency's rollback of coal plant emissions limits as "worthless."
"Have your dog pee on it. It is not accurate," Zeldin remarked.
Following this exchange, Harder’s office shared the EPA report from which he derived his figures.
Zeldin's Perspective
Zeldin contended that despite budget reductions, the EPA has continued to rigorously enforce environmental statutes. He cited an agreement with Mexico aimed at reducing contaminated sewage flows into the heavily polluted Tijuana River, alongside accelerated efforts to resolve radioactive pollution issues in the St. Louis area.
He positioned these actions as indicative of legitimate adherence to the law, contrasting them with what he characterizes as the regulatory overreach of the Biden administration, which he claims sought to inhibit critical industries like coal.
While Republicans broadly supported Zeldin's assertion that the EPA could accomplish more with fewer resources, the bipartisan infrastructure law passed in 2021 had previously allocated billions of dollars for state-administered drinking and wastewater loan programs. This funding, however, is set to cease this year, and the proposed budget would significantly reduce the agency's support.
"It was never intended to establish a new norm for expenditure," remarked Morgan Griffith, a Republican representative of Virginia.
However, this reduction threatens funding for the removal of hazardous chemicals known as PFAS, which can persist in drinking water for decades. The agency's claim that technological advancements could resolve the issue at a lower cost was deemed unconvincing by Jake Auchincloss, a Democratic representative from Massachusetts.
"How can we eliminate PFAS from municipal water supplies with 90% less funding?" he inquired.
Zeldin responded with references to promising technologies and Congressional earmarks, which have historically been used to fund projects within districts, diverting funds that could otherwise support states' loans—an approach that has faced criticism from numerous experts.
"I understand that members of Congress are likely to raid it, and they have been doing so for a long time," Zeldin commented.
In turn, Auchincloss pointed out that Zeldin was not responsible for earmarks and stated that "hope is not a strategy."
Zeldin faced inquiries regarding industry influence on EPA policy, notably concerning the "Make America Healthy Again" initiative, which has flagged environmental issues stemming from products such as fertilizers. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the former health secretary under Trump, has been a prominent advocate for this movement.
Chellie Pingree, a Democratic representative from Maine, questioned Zeldin about understanding advocates' concerns over industry influence at the EPA in light of the administration's endorsement of increased pesticide use.
Zeldin responded by labeling much of her extensive question as inaccurate and mentioned plans to investigate microplastics as a potential contaminant in drinking water, along with an upcoming examination of glyphosate, a well-known herbicide.
Share this story