BBC Sport
Southampton has formally lodged an appeal against their expulsion from the Championship play-offs, contending that the punishment is "manifestly disproportionate to every previous sanction in the history of the English game."
An independent disciplinary commission from the English Football League (EFL) took the decisive action against Southampton on Tuesday evening, resulting in the club’s removal from the play-offs and the reinstatement of Middlesbrough, who will now contest the final against Hull City on Saturday.
Additionally, the St Mary’s club has been subjected to a four-point deduction for the forthcoming Championship season after acknowledging breaches of two EFL regulations.
Chief Executive Phil Parsons expressed regret "to the other clubs involved, and most notably to the Southampton supporters" who he indicated "deserved better from the club."
The appeal filed by Southampton is scheduled to be reviewed by an independent league arbitration panel later on Wednesday.
Parsons further asserted that "what transpired was wrong," but emphasized that the club "cannot accept a sanction which bears no proportion to the offence."
To support their case, Southampton referenced a £200,000 fine imposed on Leeds United in 2019 for spygate activities against Derby County as a precedent. However, it is important to note that the punishment to Leeds came before the introduction of regulation 127, which explicitly prohibits observing an opponent within 72 hours of a match.
"Southampton has been denied the chance to compete in a game valued at over £200 million, a game that holds immense significance for our staff, players, and supporters," Parsons stated.
"We assert that the financial implications of yesterday's ruling make it, by a substantial margin, the largest penalty ever administered to an English football club."
The club's statement highlighted several historical point deductions, including Luton Town's unprecedented 30-point sanctions in the 2008-09 season, which ultimately resulted in their relegation.
Southampton maintained that Luton's situation, which involved entering administration and making illegal payments to players, did not present comparable revenue stakes akin to those associated with the Championship play-off final.
The club also referenced earlier deductions for Derby County in 2021, Everton in the 2023-24 season, and Chelsea's ability to circumvent severe penalties with merely a financial fine this year for infractions involving payments to agents and other clubs.
"We present this argument not to downplay the issues that arose at our club, which we have accepted was wrong," Parsons remarked.
"We do so because the principle of proportionality is a fundamental aspect of natural justice.
"The Commission indeed had the authority to impose a sanction; however, we will argue that it did not possess the right to impose a penalty that is manifestly disproportionate to any previous sanction in the history of English football."
Share this story